Posted by Charlie
Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:14:00 GMT
Sean mentioned the idea of using
YAML for MapServer configuration files instead of XML. I wholeheartedly agree.
The most important thing for a configuration file is that it is easily readable
and editable. YAML's simpler syntax and conciseness is a big win in this case.
After reading his article, a brilliant idea occurred to me (well,
at least I thought it was brilliant!) - use YAML to serialize RDF. RDF's
graph data model maps poorly onto XML's hierarchical model, making RDF's XML
serialization format more complicated than RDF itself. This complexity has been
the subject of endless debates and
has led to a number of alternative syntaxes
over the years, such as Notation
3, Turtle, RPV,
etc. Yet none of them have have been widely adopted.
XML's main advantages,
compared
to other serialization formats, are its extensibility, strong internationalization
support and strong tool support.
A quick look at the YAML specification shows
it supports UTF8 and UTF16 encodings, so its internationalization
support looks good (I haven't done any testing to see if the reality is different).
YAML's tool support is also good - you can find YAML parsers for Ruby, Python,
PHP, JavaScript (using the JSON subset)
and other languages as well.
Just like with XML, you can serialize custom vocabularies using YAML.
However, YAML lacks a schema language. But if you're using RDF and require a
schema, then clearly you will use RDF
schema.
RDF schema reuses the RDF XML serialization format, so I would take
the same approach with YAML and use it to both encode RDF and RDF schemas.
Curious to see what work has been done in this area, I did a quick search.
It turns out that Micah Dubinko suggested using
YAML for RDF more than three years ago on the xml-dev mailing
list.
As far as implementations, the only example I could find was a Perl module
that
hasn't bee updated since 2003. Now that some of the hype around XML has died
down, and YAML has established itself as a legitimate format, it seems
like a good time to revisit this idea.
Posted in Design, Design, Modeling, Modeling, YAML, YAML | 2 comments | no trackbacks
Posted by Charlie
Sun, 30 Jul 2006 05:14:00 GMT
Sean mentioned the idea of using
YAML for MapServer configuration files instead of XML. I wholeheartedly agree.
The most important thing for a configuration file is that it is easily readable
and editable. YAML's simpler syntax and conciseness is a big win in this case.
After reading his article, a brilliant idea occurred to me (well,
at least I thought it was brilliant!) - use YAML to serialize RDF. RDF's
graph data model maps poorly onto XML's hierarchical model, making RDF's XML
serialization format more complicated than RDF itself. This complexity has been
the subject of endless debates and
has led to a number of alternative syntaxes
over the years, such as Notation
3, Turtle, RPV,
etc. Yet none of them have have been widely adopted.
XML's main advantages,
compared
to other serialization formats, are its extensibility, strong internationalization
support and strong tool support.
A quick look at the YAML specification shows
it supports UTF8 and UTF16 encodings, so its internationalization
support looks good (I haven't done any testing to see if the reality is different).
YAML's tool support is also good - you can find YAML parsers for Ruby, Python,
PHP, JavaScript (using the JSON subset)
and other languages as well.
Just like with XML, you can serialize custom vocabularies using YAML.
However, YAML lacks a schema language. But if you're using RDF and require a
schema, then clearly you will use RDF
schema.
RDF schema reuses the RDF XML serialization format, so I would take
the same approach with YAML and use it to both encode RDF and RDF schemas.
Curious to see what work has been done in this area, I did a quick search.
It turns out that Micah Dubinko suggested using
YAML for RDF more than three years ago on the xml-dev mailing
list.
As far as implementations, the only example I could find was a Perl module
that
hasn't bee updated since 2003. Now that some of the hype around XML has died
down, and YAML has established itself as a legitimate format, it seems
like a good time to revisit this idea.
Posted in Design, Design, Modeling, Modeling, YAML, YAML | 2 comments | no trackbacks
Posted by Charlie
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:04:00 GMT
So for MapBuzz we have some machines
running on Ruby 1.8.2 and 1.8.4. And we use GEOS,
a C++ library, for manipulating geometries. These geometries are part of Rails test
fixtures, and thus must support custom YAML marshalling. Turns out there
were some big changes in YAML between 1.8.2 and 1.8.4.After struggling
most of today with this, partially due to lack of documentation, here is
what we found.
We’ll use an example of a simple coordinate class that has an x and
a y value. What we want to end up with is this:
!ruby/Geos::Geometry
x: 7
y: 4
Ruby 1.8.2
For Ruby 1.8.2, the to_yaml_type controls the type that is output in the
YAML document (the !ruby/Geos::Geometry bit).
You also need to define a method to output YAML (to_yaml naturally
enough) and one to read YAML (add_ruby_type strangely).
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
def to_yaml_type
"!ruby/#{self.class}"
end
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(to_yaml_type) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
YAML.add_ruby_type( /^Geos::Coordinate/ ) do |type, val|
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
Ruby 1.8.4
Things are significantly different with Ruby 1.8.4. First, the add_ruby_type
method has been deprecated in favor of a class method called yaml_new.
In fact, as far as I can see the add_ruby_type no
longer works. Another major change is the use of taguris, such as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002." In
fact, the 1.8.2 form !ruby is a shortcut for
a YAML tag.
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
yaml_as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002:#{self}"
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(taguri) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
def self.yaml_new(klass, tag, val)
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
Of course, writing code that works on both platforms is kind of a pain.
The approach we are using is:
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
yaml_as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002:#{self}"
if not self.respond_to?(:taguri)
def taguri
"!ruby/#{self.class}"
end
YAML.add_ruby_type( /^Geos::Coordinate/ ) do |type, val|
Coordinate.yaml_new(Geos::Coordinate, type, val)
end
end
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(taguri) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
def self.yaml_new(klass, tag, val)
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
This requires putting this code somewhere:
if not Module.methods.include?('yaml_as')
class Module
def yaml_as( tag, sc = true )
end
end
end
Hope this helps!
Posted in Ruby, Ruby, YAML, YAML | no comments | no trackbacks
Posted by Charlie
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:04:00 GMT
So for MapBuzz we have some machines
running on Ruby 1.8.2 and 1.8.4. And we use GEOS,
a C++ library, for manipulating geometries. These geometries are part of Rails test
fixtures, and thus must support custom YAML marshalling. Turns out there
were some big changes in YAML between 1.8.2 and 1.8.4.After struggling
most of today with this, partially due to lack of documentation, here is
what we found.
We’ll use an example of a simple coordinate class that has an x and
a y value. What we want to end up with is this:
!ruby/Geos::Geometry
x: 7
y: 4
Ruby 1.8.2
For Ruby 1.8.2, the to_yaml_type controls the type that is output in the
YAML document (the !ruby/Geos::Geometry bit).
You also need to define a method to output YAML (to_yaml naturally
enough) and one to read YAML (add_ruby_type strangely).
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
def to_yaml_type
"!ruby/#{self.class}"
end
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(to_yaml_type) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
YAML.add_ruby_type( /^Geos::Coordinate/ ) do |type, val|
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
Ruby 1.8.4
Things are significantly different with Ruby 1.8.4. First, the add_ruby_type
method has been deprecated in favor of a class method called yaml_new.
In fact, as far as I can see the add_ruby_type no
longer works. Another major change is the use of taguris, such as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002." In
fact, the 1.8.2 form !ruby is a shortcut for
a YAML tag.
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
yaml_as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002:#{self}"
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(taguri) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
def self.yaml_new(klass, tag, val)
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
Of course, writing code that works on both platforms is kind of a pain.
The approach we are using is:
require 'geos'
class Coordinate
yaml_as "tag:ruby.yaml.org,2002:#{self}"
if not self.respond_to?(:taguri)
def taguri
"!ruby/#{self.class}"
end
YAML.add_ruby_type( /^Geos::Coordinate/ ) do |type, val|
Coordinate.yaml_new(Geos::Coordinate, type, val)
end
end
def to_yaml( opts = {} )
YAML::quick_emit( self.object_id, opts ) do |out|
out.map(taguri) do |map|
['x','y'].each do |m|
map.add( m, self.send(m) )
end
end
end
end
def self.yaml_new(klass, tag, val)
result = Geos::Coordinate.new()
val.each_pair do |k,v|
result.send("#{k}=", v)
end
result
end
end
This requires putting this code somewhere:
if not Module.methods.include?('yaml_as')
class Module
def yaml_as( tag, sc = true )
end
end
end
Hope this helps!
Posted in Ruby, Ruby, YAML, YAML | no comments | no trackbacks
